tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8224331.post114975468239642857..comments2021-03-07T13:41:07.264-05:00Comments on INCourts: Gutermuth: The Blakely WayBack MachineUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8224331.post-1149790619544765962006-06-08T14:16:00.000-04:002006-06-08T14:16:00.000-04:00In your post, you state:"Interestingly, Judge Frie...In your post, you state:<BR/><BR/>"Interestingly, Judge Friedlander concurred in both Gutermuth and Robbins."<BR/><BR/>That is incorrect. Judge Friedlander dissented in Gutermuth because he believed that the Robbins rationale is correct, at least until the Indiana Supreme Court resolves the retroactivity/belated notice of appeal issue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com